Hong Kong, China vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland

Hong Kong, China
30,000 current US$
in 1996
Liberia
29,494 current US$
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
137th
Liberia rank
139th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Liberia
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 29,494 current US$ in Liberia, a difference of 506 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 137th and Liberia ranks 139th of 153 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Liberia Difference Ahead
1970s 35,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ 5,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1980s 60,000 current US$ 25,000 current US$ 35,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1990s 23,333 current US$ 1.38 million current US$ 1.36 million current US$ Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland, Hong Kong, China or Liberia?
Hong Kong, China, at 30,000 current US$ against 29,494 current US$ in Liberia as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland between Hong Kong, China and Liberia?
506 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Liberia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Liberia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland?
Hong Kong, China ranks 137th and Liberia ranks 139th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/liberia/">Hong Kong, China vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
199 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.