Aruba vs Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps

Aruba
20,000 current US$
in 2002
Hong Kong
30,000 current US$
in 2000
Aruba rank
171st
Hong Kong rank
169th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time

  • Aruba
  • Hong Kong
-60.0M-40.0M-20.0M020.0M40.0M196019812002

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Aruba, a difference of 10,000 current US$.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.5 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Aruba ranks 171st and Hong Kong ranks 169th of 180 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1980s 23.36 million current US$ 14.69 million current US$ 8.68 million current US$ Aruba
1990s 20.24 million current US$ 3.00 million current US$ 17.24 million current US$ Aruba
2000s 50,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Aruba or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Aruba as of 2000.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Aruba and Hong Kong?
10,000 current US$, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong?
16 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2000.
How do Aruba and Hong Kong rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
Aruba ranks 171st and Hong Kong ranks 169th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/aruba/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/aruba/hong-kong-sar-china/">Aruba vs Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 11,650 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.