Croatia vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Estonia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 146.26 million current US$ against 134.80 million current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 11.46 million current US$.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 104th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57.74 million current US$ | 63.40 million current US$ | 5.66 million current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 99.09 million current US$ | 79.92 million current US$ | 19.17 million current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Estonia?
- Croatia, at 146.26 million current US$ against 134.80 million current US$ in Estonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Estonia?
- 11.46 million current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 104th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.