Czechia vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Namibia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 277.13 million current US$ against 244.02 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 33.11 million current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Czechia ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 180 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 176.25 million current US$ | 149.86 million current US$ | 26.39 million current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 288.13 million current US$ | 129.58 million current US$ | 158.55 million current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Namibia?
- Czechia, at 277.13 million current US$ against 244.02 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Namibia?
- 33.11 million current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Namibia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.