Gibraltar vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps

Gibraltar
10,000 current US$
in 2002
Macau, China
10,000 current US$
in 2003
Gibraltar rank
173rd
Macau, China rank
173rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Macau, China
010.0M20.0M30.0M196019812003

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Macau, China, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Macau, China ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 173rd and Macau, China ranks 173rd of 180 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 4 and Macau, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Macau, China Difference Ahead
1960s 901,111 current US$ 785,556 current US$ 115,556 current US$ Gibraltar
1970s 6.53 million current US$ 20,000 current US$ 6.51 million current US$ Gibraltar
1980s 11.70 million current US$ 91,000 current US$ 11.61 million current US$ Gibraltar
1990s 742,000 current US$ 231,000 current US$ 511,000 current US$ Gibraltar
2000s 16,667 current US$ 98,333 current US$ 81,667 current US$ Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Gibraltar or Macau, China?
Gibraltar, at 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Macau, China as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Gibraltar and Macau, China?
0 current US$, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Macau, China?
33 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2002.
How do Gibraltar and Macau, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
Gibraltar ranks 173rd and Macau, China ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/gibraltar/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/gibraltar/macao-sar-china/">Gibraltar vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 11,650 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.