IDA only vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps

IDA only
40.02 billion current US$
in 2022
Jordan
2.28 billion current US$
in 2023
IDA only rank
9th
Jordan rank
7th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time

  • IDA only
  • Jordan
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196019912023

How they compare

IDA only currently reports 40.02 billion current US$ against 2.28 billion current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 37.74 billion current US$.

That makes IDA only's figure about 17.6 times Jordan's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, IDA only has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 9th and Jordan ranks 7th of 44 groups.

IDA only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 2.54 billion current US$ 88.83 million current US$ 2.45 billion current US$ IDA only
1980s 7.74 billion current US$ 107.90 million current US$ 7.63 billion current US$ IDA only
1990s 12.25 billion current US$ 411.19 million current US$ 11.84 billion current US$ IDA only
2000s 21.28 billion current US$ 523.48 million current US$ 20.76 billion current US$ IDA only
2010s 36.52 billion current US$ 1.50 billion current US$ 35.02 billion current US$ IDA only
2020s 41.84 billion current US$ 2.25 billion current US$ 39.58 billion current US$ IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, IDA only or Jordan?
IDA only, at 40.02 billion current US$ against 2.28 billion current US$ in Jordan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between IDA only and Jordan?
37.74 billion current US$, with IDA only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Jordan?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA only and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
IDA only ranks 9th and Jordan ranks 7th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-only/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-only/jordan/">IDA only vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 11,650 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.