Malawi vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time
- Malawi
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 901.05 million current US$ against 853.56 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 47.49 million current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 35th and Romania ranks 32nd of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 267.36 million current US$ | 257.38 million current US$ | 9.98 million current US$ | Malawi |
| 2000s | 324.75 million current US$ | 587.63 million current US$ | 262.87 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Malawi or Romania?
- Romania, at 901.05 million current US$ against 853.56 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Malawi and Romania?
- 47.49 million current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Malawi ranks 35th and Romania ranks 32nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.