Nigeria vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps
Nigeria
1.58 billion current US$
in 2023
Poland
1.51 billion current US$
in 2004
Nigeria rank
14th
Poland rank
15th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps over time
- Nigeria
- Poland
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 1.58 billion current US$ against 1.51 billion current US$ in Poland, a difference of 66.46 million current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 14th and Poland ranks 15th of 180 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 110.51 million current US$ | 1.60 billion current US$ | 1.49 billion current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 204.28 million current US$ | 1.18 billion current US$ | 977.11 million current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Nigeria or Poland?
- Nigeria, at 1.58 billion current US$ against 1.51 billion current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Nigeria and Poland?
- 66.46 million current US$, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Poland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Nigeria and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Nigeria ranks 14th and Poland ranks 15th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.