Russia vs Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) … gaps
Russia
1.25 billion current US$
in 2004
Turkey
1.23 billion current US$
in 2023
Russia rank
22nd
Turkey rank
23rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) … gaps over time
- Russia
- Turkey
How they compare
Russia currently reports 1.25 billion current US$ against 1.23 billion current US$ in Turkey, a difference of 14.75 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turkey ahead.
Russia ranks 22nd and Turkey ranks 23rd of 180 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.32 billion current US$ | 227.23 million current US$ | 1.10 billion current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 1.22 billion current US$ | 218.68 million current US$ | 997.47 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps, Russia or Turkey?
- Russia, at 1.25 billion current US$ against 1.23 billion current US$ in Turkey as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps between Russia and Turkey?
- 14.75 million current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Turkey?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Russia and Turkey rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Russia ranks 22nd and Turkey ranks 23rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.