Barbados vs Comoros: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Barbados
34,419 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Comoros
29,668 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
16th
Comoros rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Comoros
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196619942023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre against 29,668 current US$ per square kilometre in Comoros, a difference of 4,751 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 16th and Comoros ranks 18th of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Comoros in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Comoros Difference Ahead
1960s 2,331 current US$ per square kilometre 4,015 current US$ per square kilometre 1,684 current US$ per square kilometre Comoros
1970s 9,567 current US$ per square kilometre 6,519 current US$ per square kilometre 3,049 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 9,933 current US$ per square kilometre 14,189 current US$ per square kilometre 4,256 current US$ per square kilometre Comoros
1990s 10,300 current US$ per square kilometre 16,235 current US$ per square kilometre 5,935 current US$ per square kilometre Comoros
2000s 20,551 current US$ per square kilometre 11,988 current US$ per square kilometre 8,563 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre 17,748 current US$ per square kilometre 16,670 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Barbados or Comoros?
Barbados, at 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre against 29,668 current US$ per square kilometre in Comoros as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Barbados and Comoros?
4,751 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Comoros?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Comoros rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 16th and Comoros ranks 18th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Comoros: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/comoros/">Barbados vs Comoros: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.