Belize vs Egypt: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Belize
770.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
751.56 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
123rd
Egypt rank
124th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Belize
  • Egypt
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 770.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 751.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 18.98 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 123rd and Egypt ranks 124th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Egypt in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 174.48 current US$ per square kilometre 106.63 current US$ per square kilometre 67.85 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1970s 335.69 current US$ per square kilometre 348.24 current US$ per square kilometre 12.55 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 693.73 current US$ per square kilometre 1,462 current US$ per square kilometre 768.29 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 828.98 current US$ per square kilometre 2,376 current US$ per square kilometre 1,547 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 496.32 current US$ per square kilometre 1,038 current US$ per square kilometre 541.77 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 859.21 current US$ per square kilometre 522.39 current US$ per square kilometre 336.82 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 708.34 current US$ per square kilometre 1,308 current US$ per square kilometre 600.11 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Belize or Egypt?
Belize, at 770.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 751.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Belize and Egypt?
18.98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Egypt rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Belize ranks 123rd and Egypt ranks 124th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Egypt: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/egypt-arab-rep/">Belize vs Egypt: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.