Benin vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Benin
5,071 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
4,942 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Benin rank
57th
Eswatini rank
58th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Benin
  • Eswatini
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 5,071 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,942 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 129 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Benin ranks 57th and Eswatini ranks 58th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 96.77 current US$ per square kilometre 552.13 current US$ per square kilometre 455.36 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 282.27 current US$ per square kilometre 915.7 current US$ per square kilometre 633.43 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 690.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1,543 current US$ per square kilometre 852.96 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 1,577 current US$ per square kilometre 1,966 current US$ per square kilometre 389.01 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 2,509 current US$ per square kilometre 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre 1,253 current US$ per square kilometre Benin
2010s 3,151 current US$ per square kilometre 4,542 current US$ per square kilometre 1,391 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 4,536 current US$ per square kilometre 5,285 current US$ per square kilometre 749.61 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Benin or Eswatini?
Benin, at 5,071 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,942 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Benin and Eswatini?
129 current US$ per square kilometre, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Benin and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Benin ranks 57th and Eswatini ranks 58th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benin vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/benin/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/benin/eswatini/">Benin vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.