Bhutan vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Bhutan
2,031 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
2,129 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
96th
Ecuador rank
94th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Bhutan
  • Ecuador
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,129 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,031 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 98 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bhutan ranks 96th and Ecuador ranks 94th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre 64.92 current US$ per square kilometre 63.45 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 11.79 current US$ per square kilometre 89.81 current US$ per square kilometre 78.01 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 189.37 current US$ per square kilometre 287.14 current US$ per square kilometre 97.77 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre 642.52 current US$ per square kilometre 463.81 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 1,327 current US$ per square kilometre 792.58 current US$ per square kilometre 534.21 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 1,516 current US$ per square kilometre 969.23 current US$ per square kilometre 547.19 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 1,446 current US$ per square kilometre 1,462 current US$ per square kilometre 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Bhutan or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 2,129 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,031 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Bhutan and Ecuador?
98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ecuador?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Ecuador rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Bhutan ranks 96th and Ecuador ranks 94th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/ecuador/">Bhutan vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.