East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
456.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Serbia
9,326 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
35th
Serbia rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Serbia
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 9,326 current US$ per square kilometre against 456.96 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 8,869 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 20.4 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th and Serbia ranks 38th of 44 groups.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 391.29 current US$ per square kilometre 10,646 current US$ per square kilometre 10,255 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 403.61 current US$ per square kilometre 7,371 current US$ per square kilometre 6,968 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 496.64 current US$ per square kilometre 7,575 current US$ per square kilometre 7,078 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Serbia?
Serbia, at 9,326 current US$ per square kilometre against 456.96 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Serbia?
8,869 current US$ per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Serbia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th and Serbia ranks 38th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/serbia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.