Ecuador vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current) … square

Ecuador
2,129 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Laos
1,886 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
94th
Laos rank
97th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Laos
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,129 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,886 current US$ per square kilometre in Laos, a difference of 243 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Laos's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Laos ahead.

Ecuador ranks 94th and Laos ranks 97th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Laos in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Laos Difference Ahead
1960s 59.76 current US$ per square kilometre 239.67 current US$ per square kilometre 179.92 current US$ per square kilometre Laos
1970s 89.81 current US$ per square kilometre 212.4 current US$ per square kilometre 122.59 current US$ per square kilometre Laos
1980s 287.14 current US$ per square kilometre 100.52 current US$ per square kilometre 186.63 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 642.52 current US$ per square kilometre 585.8 current US$ per square kilometre 56.72 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 792.58 current US$ per square kilometre 914.21 current US$ per square kilometre 121.63 current US$ per square kilometre Laos
2010s 969.23 current US$ per square kilometre 1,403 current US$ per square kilometre 434.06 current US$ per square kilometre Laos
2020s 1,462 current US$ per square kilometre 1,731 current US$ per square kilometre 268.27 current US$ per square kilometre Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Ecuador or Laos?
Ecuador, at 2,129 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,886 current US$ per square kilometre in Laos as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Ecuador and Laos?
243 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Laos?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Laos rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 94th and Laos ranks 97th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/lao-pdr/">Ecuador vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.