Georgia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Georgia
7,483 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
88.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Georgia rank
43rd
OECD members rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Georgia
  • OECD members
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 7,483 current US$ per square kilometre against 88.4 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 7,395 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 84.6 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was OECD members ahead.

Georgia ranks 43rd and OECD members ranks 41st of 178 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia OECD members Difference Ahead
1990s 1,466 current US$ per square kilometre 116.94 current US$ per square kilometre 1,349 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 4,392 current US$ per square kilometre 77.4 current US$ per square kilometre 4,314 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 7,017 current US$ per square kilometre 116.35 current US$ per square kilometre 6,900 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 11,926 current US$ per square kilometre 93.55 current US$ per square kilometre 11,832 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Georgia or OECD members?
Georgia, at 7,483 current US$ per square kilometre against 88.4 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Georgia and OECD members?
7,395 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and OECD members?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Georgia ranks 43rd and OECD members ranks 41st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/oecd-members/">Georgia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.