Grenada vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Grenada
16,322 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
15,284 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Grenada rank
28th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Grenada
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k197419982023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 16,322 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,284 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 1,038 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 28th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 29th of 178 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 3,956 current US$ per square kilometre 3,077 current US$ per square kilometre 878.69 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 34,971 current US$ per square kilometre 7,386 current US$ per square kilometre 27,584 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 23,815 current US$ per square kilometre 10,067 current US$ per square kilometre 13,747 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 33,224 current US$ per square kilometre 4,875 current US$ per square kilometre 28,349 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Grenada or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Grenada, at 16,322 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,284 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Grenada and Turks and Caicos Islands?
1,038 current US$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2007.
How do Grenada and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Grenada ranks 28th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 29th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Grenada vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.