Hong Kong, China vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
28.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2000
Oman
24.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd
Oman rank
163rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Oman
-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k020.0k196119852010

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 24.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Oman ranks 163rd of 178 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 4 and Oman in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 2,576 current US$ per square kilometre 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre 2,573 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 1,560 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre 1,558 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 9,916 current US$ per square kilometre 35.91 current US$ per square kilometre 9,880 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 3,601 current US$ per square kilometre 79.68 current US$ per square kilometre 3,521 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre 29.76 current US$ per square kilometre 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Oman?
Hong Kong, China, at 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 24.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2000.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Oman?
3.82 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Oman?
37 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2000.
How do Hong Kong, China and Oman rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Oman ranks 163rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oman/">Hong Kong, China vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.