Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
28.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2000
Singapore
72.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd
Singapore rank
159th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Singapore
-50.0k050.0k100.0k150.0k196119822004

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 72.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 44 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.5 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Singapore ranks 159th of 178 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 2,576 current US$ per square kilometre 5,045 current US$ per square kilometre 2,469 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 1,748 current US$ per square kilometre 24,643 current US$ per square kilometre 22,895 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 9,916 current US$ per square kilometre 42,178 current US$ per square kilometre 32,262 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 3,060 current US$ per square kilometre 19,201 current US$ per square kilometre 16,142 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 72.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
44 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
35 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1995.
How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Singapore ranks 159th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.