Least developed countries vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Least developed countries
1,693 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Malta
34,844 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Least developed countries rank
12th
Malta rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Malta
0100.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,693 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 33,151 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 20.6 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 12th and Malta ranks 15th of 44 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 131.91 current US$ per square kilometre 63,666 current US$ per square kilometre 63,534 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 400.13 current US$ per square kilometre 39,306 current US$ per square kilometre 38,906 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 576.5 current US$ per square kilometre 83,934 current US$ per square kilometre 83,358 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 562.77 current US$ per square kilometre 37,260 current US$ per square kilometre 36,698 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Least developed countries or Malta?
Malta, at 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,693 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Least developed countries and Malta?
33,151 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Malta?
33 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2002.
How do Least developed countries and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Least developed countries ranks 12th and Malta ranks 15th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malta/">Least developed countries vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.