Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Malta
34,844 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Sao Tome and Principe
38,526 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
15th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Malta
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 38,526 current US$ per square kilometre against 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 3,682 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 15th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 178 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 44,906 current US$ per square kilometre 850.69 current US$ per square kilometre 44,056 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 74,006 current US$ per square kilometre 1,654 current US$ per square kilometre 72,352 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 39,306 current US$ per square kilometre 8,805 current US$ per square kilometre 30,501 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 83,934 current US$ per square kilometre 32,924 current US$ per square kilometre 51,010 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 37,260 current US$ per square kilometre 25,083 current US$ per square kilometre 12,177 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 38,526 current US$ per square kilometre against 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
3,682 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Malta ranks 15th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.