Mauritius vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Mauritius
38,188 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
34,127 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
14th
Samoa rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Samoa
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 38,188 current US$ per square kilometre against 34,127 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 4,061 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 14th and Samoa ranks 17th of 178 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 2,392 current US$ per square kilometre 120.14 current US$ per square kilometre 2,272 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 6,959 current US$ per square kilometre 2,563 current US$ per square kilometre 4,396 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 20,525 current US$ per square kilometre 6,963 current US$ per square kilometre 13,562 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 18,262 current US$ per square kilometre 11,337 current US$ per square kilometre 6,925 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 22,149 current US$ per square kilometre 12,304 current US$ per square kilometre 9,845 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 42,935 current US$ per square kilometre 28,923 current US$ per square kilometre 14,012 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 89,399 current US$ per square kilometre 25,475 current US$ per square kilometre 63,925 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Mauritius or Samoa?
Mauritius, at 38,188 current US$ per square kilometre against 34,127 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Mauritius and Samoa?
4,061 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Mauritius ranks 14th and Samoa ranks 17th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/samoa/">Mauritius vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.