Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 38,526 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,864 current US$ per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), a difference of 36,662 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 20.7 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 10th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 62.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 850.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 788.51 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1970s | 266.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,654 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,387 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1980s | 438.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,805 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,366 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1990s | 661.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 32,924 current US$ per square kilometre | 32,262 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 1,404 current US$ per square kilometre | 26,741 current US$ per square kilometre | 25,336 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 1,824 current US$ per square kilometre | 30,668 current US$ per square kilometre | 28,844 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 2,008 current US$ per square kilometre | 34,382 current US$ per square kilometre | 32,374 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 38,526 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,864 current US$ per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 36,662 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 10th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.