Eswatini vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Eswatini
0.0184 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0175 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eswatini rank
61st
Mauritania rank
63rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mauritania
00.10.20.3196019912023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0184 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0175 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 61st and Mauritania ranks 63rd of 174 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1465 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0309 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1156 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1970s 0.0546 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0465 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0081 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1980s 0.0496 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.088 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0384 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1990s 0.0244 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0872 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0628 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2000s 0.0085 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0681 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0595 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 0.0179 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0226 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0047 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2020s 0.0199 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0167 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Eswatini or Mauritania?
Eswatini, at 0.0184 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0175 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Eswatini and Mauritania?
0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mauritania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 61st and Mauritania ranks 63rd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/mauritania/">Eswatini vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
221 places, 10,803 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.