Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per
Eswatini
0.0184 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0188 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2007
Eswatini rank
61st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
60th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time
- Eswatini
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0188 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0184 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 61st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 60th of 174 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Eswatini or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0188 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0184 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2007.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2007.
- How do Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Eswatini ranks 61st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 60th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.