Cuba vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total

Cuba
92.95 million current US$
in 2023
Eswatini
85.01 million current US$
in 2023
Cuba rank
116th
Eswatini rank
118th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total over time

  • Cuba
  • Eswatini
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196019912023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 92.95 million current US$ against 85.01 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 7.94 million current US$.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Eswatini ahead.

Cuba ranks 116th and Eswatini ranks 118th of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 20,000 current US$ 9.39 million current US$ 9.37 million current US$ Eswatini
1970s 14.02 million current US$ 15.75 million current US$ 1.73 million current US$ Eswatini
1980s 8.64 million current US$ 26.55 million current US$ 17.90 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 40.10 million current US$ 33.82 million current US$ 6.28 million current US$ Cuba
2000s 66.41 million current US$ 21.61 million current US$ 44.80 million current US$ Cuba
2010s 357.83 million current US$ 78.12 million current US$ 279.71 million current US$ Cuba
2020s 107.87 million current US$ 90.91 million current US$ 16.96 million current US$ Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total, Cuba or Eswatini?
Cuba, at 92.95 million current US$ against 85.01 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total between Cuba and Eswatini?
7.94 million current US$, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
58 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total?
Cuba ranks 116th and Eswatini ranks 118th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
227 places, 11,600 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.