East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-49.84 % change on previous year
in 2022
Slovenia
10.53 % change on previous year
in 2002
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
38th
Slovenia rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Slovenia
-2000200400600197119962022

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 10.53 % change on previous year against -49.84 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 60.37 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1996 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 38th and Slovenia ranks 41st of 45 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1058 % change on previous year -57.04 % change on previous year 57.15 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 2.34 % change on previous year 226.71 % change on previous year 224.37 % change on previous year Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 10.53 % change on previous year against -49.84 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Slovenia?
60.37 % change on previous year, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Slovenia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2002.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 38th and Slovenia ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/slovenia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 9,378 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.