Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Kingdom United annual

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
-16.37 % change on previous year
in 2022
East Timor
92.52 % change on previous year
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
14th
East Timor rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Kingdom United annual over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • East Timor
0200400197119972023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 92.52 % change on previous year against -16.37 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 108.89 % change on previous year.

That makes East Timor's figure about 5.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and East Timor ranks 14th of 45 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 17.98 % change on previous year 43.28 % change on previous year 25.3 % change on previous year East Timor
2010s -2.12 % change on previous year 15.51 % change on previous year 17.62 % change on previous year East Timor
2020s -21.05 % change on previous year -39.69 % change on previous year 18.64 % change on previous year Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or East Timor?
East Timor, at 92.52 % change on previous year against -16.37 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and East Timor?
108.89 % change on previous year, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and East Timor?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and East Timor ranks 14th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/timor-leste/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 9,378 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.