Belarus vs Comoros: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Belarus
239,456 current US$
in 2023
Comoros
231,251 current US$
in 2022
Belarus rank
109th
Comoros rank
112th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- Belarus
- Comoros
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 239,456 current US$ against 231,251 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 8,205 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 109th and Comoros ranks 112th of 169 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.01 million current US$ | 77,736 current US$ | 935,974 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2.36 million current US$ | 193,668 current US$ | 2.16 million current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Belarus or Comoros?
- Belarus, at 239,456 current US$ against 231,251 current US$ in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Belarus and Comoros?
- 8,205 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Comoros?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Comoros rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Belarus ranks 109th and Comoros ranks 112th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.