Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Brazil
77.55 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.40 billion current US$
in 2023
Brazil rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Brazil
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.0B4.0B6.0B196019912023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 1.40 billion current US$ against 77.55 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 1.33 billion current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 18.1 times Brazil's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 169 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.06 million current US$ 180.94 million current US$ 179.88 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 1.92 million current US$ 156.91 million current US$ 155.00 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 4.70 million current US$ 380.95 million current US$ 376.25 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 7.82 million current US$ 648.58 million current US$ 640.77 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 10.08 million current US$ 2.39 billion current US$ 2.38 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 39.88 million current US$ 3.62 billion current US$ 3.58 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 44.46 million current US$ 2.07 billion current US$ 2.03 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Brazil or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 1.40 billion current US$ against 77.55 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.33 billion current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Brazil ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/sub-saharan-africa/">Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.