Ecuador vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 596,171 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in Poland, a difference of 86,171 current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 89th and Poland ranks 92nd of 169 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.52 million current US$ | 28.18 million current US$ | 23.66 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 730,000 current US$ | 3.54 million current US$ | 2.81 million current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Ecuador or Poland?
- Ecuador, at 596,171 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Ecuador and Poland?
- 86,171 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2003.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Ecuador ranks 89th and Poland ranks 92nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.