Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Hong Kong, China
120,000 current US$
in 1996
Latvia
100,000 current US$
in 2003
Hong Kong, China rank
128th
Latvia rank
129th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 120,000 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 20,000 current US$.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 128th and Latvia ranks 129th of 169 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 120,000 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 20,000 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 128th and Latvia ranks 129th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.