South Korea vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- South Korea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 356,106 current US$ against 240,000 current US$ in South Korea, a difference of 116,106 current US$.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times South Korea's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 107th and Namibia ranks 104th of 169 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 226,000 current US$ | 1.92 million current US$ | 1.69 million current US$ | Namibia |
| 1990s | 165,000 current US$ | 4.44 million current US$ | 4.28 million current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), South Korea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 356,106 current US$ against 240,000 current US$ in South Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between South Korea and Namibia?
- 116,106 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1995.
- How do South Korea and Namibia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- South Korea ranks 107th and Namibia ranks 104th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.