Laos vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- Laos
- Lithuania
How they compare
Laos currently reports 135,203 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 35,203 current US$.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 126th and Lithuania ranks 129th of 169 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 658,889 current US$ | 938,889 current US$ | 280,000 current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 1.20 million current US$ | 165,000 current US$ | 1.03 million current US$ | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Laos or Lithuania?
- Laos, at 135,203 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Laos and Lithuania?
- 35,203 current US$, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Lithuania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2003.
- How do Laos and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Laos ranks 126th and Lithuania ranks 129th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.