Malawi vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Malawi
40.03 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
683.19 million current US$
in 2022
Malawi rank
19th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Malawi
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019912023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 683.19 million current US$ against 40.03 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 643.16 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 17.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 19th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th of 169 countries.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1970s 19.65 million current US$ 205.73 million current US$ 186.08 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s 26.18 million current US$ 270.22 million current US$ 244.05 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 51.12 million current US$ 312.99 million current US$ 261.87 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 110.20 million current US$ 994.42 million current US$ 884.21 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 132.54 million current US$ 1.55 billion current US$ 1.42 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 60.50 million current US$ 836.13 million current US$ 775.63 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Malawi or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 683.19 million current US$ against 40.03 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Malawi and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
643.16 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Malawi and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Malawi ranks 19th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/malawi/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/malawi/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Malawi vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.