Mozambique vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Mozambique
38.52 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
683.19 million current US$
in 2022
Mozambique rank
20th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Mozambique
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196619942023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 683.19 million current US$ against 38.52 million current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 644.67 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 17.7 times Mozambique's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 20th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th of 169 countries.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1970s 5.97 million current US$ 265.56 million current US$ 259.59 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s 17.34 million current US$ 270.22 million current US$ 252.89 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 45.30 million current US$ 312.99 million current US$ 267.69 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 99.37 million current US$ 994.42 million current US$ 895.04 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 113.33 million current US$ 1.55 billion current US$ 1.44 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 61.20 million current US$ 836.13 million current US$ 774.93 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Mozambique or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 683.19 million current US$ against 38.52 million current US$ in Mozambique as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Mozambique and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
644.67 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
48 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2022.
How do Mozambique and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Mozambique ranks 20th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/mozambique/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/mozambique/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Mozambique vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.