OECD members vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

OECD members
108.61 million current US$
in 2022
South Africa
18.04 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
36th
South Africa rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • OECD members
  • South Africa
0100.0M200.0M197019962023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 108.61 million current US$ against 18.04 million current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 90.57 million current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 6.0 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 36th and South Africa ranks 33rd of 45 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 59.07 million current US$ 36.27 million current US$ 22.79 million current US$ OECD members
2000s 10.66 million current US$ 57.04 million current US$ 46.38 million current US$ South Africa
2010s 101.07 million current US$ 24.14 million current US$ 76.92 million current US$ OECD members
2020s 151.58 million current US$ 76.98 million current US$ 74.60 million current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), OECD members or South Africa?
OECD members, at 108.61 million current US$ against 18.04 million current US$ in South Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between OECD members and South Africa?
90.57 million current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and South Africa?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do OECD members and South Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
OECD members ranks 36th and South Africa ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/south-africa/">OECD members vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.