South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
683.19 million current US$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
36.25 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196119922023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 683.19 million current US$ against 36.25 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 646.94 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 18.8 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 45 groups.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 205.73 million current US$ 3.09 million current US$ 202.64 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s 270.22 million current US$ 26.59 million current US$ 243.63 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 312.99 million current US$ 38.77 million current US$ 274.22 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 994.42 million current US$ 58.41 million current US$ 936.00 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 1.55 billion current US$ 137.21 million current US$ 1.42 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 836.13 million current US$ 80.72 million current US$ 755.41 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), South Asia (IDA & IBRD) or Zimbabwe?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 683.19 million current US$ against 36.25 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
646.94 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/">South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.