Arab World vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Arab World
37.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Malawi
424.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Arab World rank
23rd
Malawi rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Arab World
  • Malawi
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 424.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 37.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Arab World, a difference of 386.96 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 11.3 times Arab World's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Arab World ranks 23rd and Malawi ranks 20th of 45 groups.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab World Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre 208.44 current US$ per square kilometre 205.89 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre 277.63 current US$ per square kilometre 269.21 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre 542.24 current US$ per square kilometre 535.32 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 45.86 current US$ per square kilometre 1,169 current US$ per square kilometre 1,123 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 83.68 current US$ per square kilometre 1,406 current US$ per square kilometre 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 72.89 current US$ per square kilometre 641.74 current US$ per square kilometre 568.85 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Arab World or Malawi?
Malawi, at 424.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 37.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Arab World as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Arab World and Malawi?
386.96 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Malawi?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Arab World and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Arab World ranks 23rd and Malawi ranks 20th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab World vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/arab-world/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/arab-world/malawi/">Arab World vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.