Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Montenegro: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
72.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
88.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
49th
Montenegro rank
48th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Montenegro
0100200300400199620092023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 88.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 72.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 15.36 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and Montenegro ranks 48th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 185.29 current US$ per square kilometre 36.93 current US$ per square kilometre 148.36 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 107.07 current US$ per square kilometre 95.67 current US$ per square kilometre 11.41 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 99.43 current US$ per square kilometre 113.1 current US$ per square kilometre 13.67 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 88.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 72.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro?
15.36 current US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and Montenegro ranks 48th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Montenegro: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/montenegro/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Montenegro: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.