Chile vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Chile
3.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Nicaragua
4.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Chile rank
109th
Nicaragua rank
108th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Chile
  • Nicaragua
-50050100150196219922022

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.23 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 109th and Nicaragua ranks 108th of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s -0.1278 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0831 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2109 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4629 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre 11.24 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.8099 current US$ per square kilometre 41.07 current US$ per square kilometre 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre 27.17 current US$ per square kilometre 22.57 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Chile or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Chile and Nicaragua?
0.23 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nicaragua?
48 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2017.
How do Chile and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Chile ranks 109th and Nicaragua ranks 108th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/nicaragua/">Chile vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.