Congo vs United Arab Emirates: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Congo
0.1241 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
United Arab Emirates
0.1408 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1994
Congo rank
157th
United Arab Emirates rank
156th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Congo
  • United Arab Emirates
050100150200250196119912022

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.1408 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1241 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1964 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Congo ranks 157th and United Arab Emirates ranks 156th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0732 current US$ per square kilometre 14.12 current US$ per square kilometre 14.04 current US$ per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
1970s 0.2552 current US$ per square kilometre 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
1980s 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre -0.1408 current US$ per square kilometre 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1408 current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Congo or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 0.1408 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1241 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 1994.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Congo and United Arab Emirates?
0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and United Arab Emirates?
13 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 1990.
How do Congo and United Arab Emirates rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Congo ranks 157th and United Arab Emirates ranks 156th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs United Arab Emirates: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/united-arab-emirates/">Congo vs United Arab Emirates: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.