Dominica vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Dominica
317.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
391.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
25th
Jordan rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Dominica
  • Jordan
010.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 391.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 317.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 73.48 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 25th and Jordan ranks 22nd of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 4,653 current US$ per square kilometre 106.72 current US$ per square kilometre 4,547 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 3,945 current US$ per square kilometre 49.77 current US$ per square kilometre 3,896 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 5,748 current US$ per square kilometre 90.88 current US$ per square kilometre 5,657 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 526.67 current US$ per square kilometre 57.81 current US$ per square kilometre 468.86 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 429.89 current US$ per square kilometre 927.45 current US$ per square kilometre 497.55 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 1,147 current US$ per square kilometre 778.87 current US$ per square kilometre 367.67 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Dominica or Jordan?
Jordan, at 391.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 317.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Dominica and Jordan?
73.48 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Jordan?
48 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Dominica ranks 25th and Jordan ranks 22nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/jordan/">Dominica vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.