Eswatini vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Eswatini
9.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
9.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
86th
Mali rank
87th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mali
-1.0k-50005001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 9.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.16 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 86th and Mali ranks 87th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 658.91 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0437 current US$ per square kilometre 658.87 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 356.69 current US$ per square kilometre 0.681 current US$ per square kilometre 356 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 96.51 current US$ per square kilometre 0.872 current US$ per square kilometre 95.64 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 194.07 current US$ per square kilometre 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre 191.67 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s -104.2 current US$ per square kilometre 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre 105.53 current US$ per square kilometre Mali
2010s 73.96 current US$ per square kilometre 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre 72.48 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 20.67 current US$ per square kilometre 9.16 current US$ per square kilometre 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Eswatini or Mali?
Eswatini, at 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 9.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Eswatini and Mali?
0.16 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mali?
56 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mali rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Eswatini ranks 86th and Mali ranks 87th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mali/">Eswatini vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.