Gibraltar vs Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Gibraltar
3,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Low & middle income
151.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
4th
Low & middle income rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Low & middle income
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 151.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 2,849 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 19.8 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 4th and Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 168 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 100,222 current US$ per square kilometre 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre 100,217 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 440,200 current US$ per square kilometre 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre 440,191 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.37 current US$ per square kilometre 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 71,700 current US$ per square kilometre 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre 71,677 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Gibraltar or Low & middle income?
Gibraltar, at 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 151.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 1999.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Gibraltar and Low & middle income?
2,849 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Low & middle income?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Gibraltar and Low & middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Gibraltar ranks 4th and Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/low-and-middle-income/">Gibraltar vs Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.