Gibraltar vs Palestine: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Kingdom United square
Gibraltar
3,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Palestine
8,713 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
4th
Palestine rank
2nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Kingdom United square over time
- Gibraltar
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 8,713 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Gibraltar, a difference of 5,713 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Palestine's figure about 2.9 times Gibraltar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Palestine ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 4th and Palestine ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Gibraltar or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 8,713 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Gibraltar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Gibraltar and Palestine?
- 5,713 current US$ per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Palestine?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and Palestine rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Gibraltar ranks 4th and Palestine ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.