Grenada vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Grenada
-185.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0072 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
166th
Mauritania rank
163rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Grenada
  • Mauritania
010.0k20.0k30.0k196419932023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0072 current US$ per square kilometre against -185.36 current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 185.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 166th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 168 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 1,229 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1921 current US$ per square kilometre 1,229 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 2,712 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5181 current US$ per square kilometre 2,711 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 3,788 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4822 current US$ per square kilometre 3,788 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 1,685 current US$ per square kilometre 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre 1,681 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 248.78 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2482 current US$ per square kilometre 248.53 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 263.19 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2057 current US$ per square kilometre 262.99 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Grenada or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.0072 current US$ per square kilometre against -185.36 current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Grenada and Mauritania?
185.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritania?
43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Mauritania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Grenada ranks 166th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/mauritania/">Grenada vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.