Guatemala vs India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Guatemala
11.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
10.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
81st
India rank
83rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Guatemala
  • India
-2000200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 11.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.67 current US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0.58 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1966 it was India ahead.

Guatemala ranks 81st and India ranks 83rd of 168 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2177 current US$ per square kilometre 23.69 current US$ per square kilometre 23.47 current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 0.7932 current US$ per square kilometre 48.24 current US$ per square kilometre 47.44 current US$ per square kilometre India
1980s 0.2533 current US$ per square kilometre 43.13 current US$ per square kilometre 42.88 current US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre 45.22 current US$ per square kilometre 40.38 current US$ per square kilometre India
2000s -6.17 current US$ per square kilometre 138.04 current US$ per square kilometre 144.21 current US$ per square kilometre India
2010s 96.18 current US$ per square kilometre 108.75 current US$ per square kilometre 12.56 current US$ per square kilometre India
2020s 14.79 current US$ per square kilometre 28.11 current US$ per square kilometre 13.32 current US$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Guatemala or India?
Guatemala, at 11.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.67 current US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Guatemala and India?
0.58 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?
52 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and India rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Guatemala ranks 81st and India ranks 83rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/">Guatemala vs India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.