IDA total vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

IDA total
75.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
919.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total rank
7th
Rwanda rank
10th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • IDA total
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 919.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 75.49 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 844.49 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 12.2 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA total ahead.

IDA total ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IDA total averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 10.57 current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre 9.05 current US$ per square kilometre IDA total
1980s 26.75 current US$ per square kilometre 8.33 current US$ per square kilometre 18.42 current US$ per square kilometre IDA total
1990s 37.14 current US$ per square kilometre 642.48 current US$ per square kilometre 605.34 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 126.83 current US$ per square kilometre 2,858 current US$ per square kilometre 2,731 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 196.28 current US$ per square kilometre 4,068 current US$ per square kilometre 3,872 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 114.07 current US$ per square kilometre 1,811 current US$ per square kilometre 1,697 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), IDA total or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 919.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 75.49 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between IDA total and Rwanda?
844.49 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Rwanda?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA total and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
IDA total ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/rwanda/">IDA total vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.