Jamaica vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Jamaica
395.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
391.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
21st
Jordan rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Jordan
-1.0k01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 395.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 391.34 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 21st and Jordan ranks 22nd of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 455.52 current US$ per square kilometre 77.29 current US$ per square kilometre 378.24 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 674.98 current US$ per square kilometre 86.64 current US$ per square kilometre 588.34 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 526.87 current US$ per square kilometre 49.77 current US$ per square kilometre 477.1 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 184.12 current US$ per square kilometre 90.88 current US$ per square kilometre 93.24 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 870.82 current US$ per square kilometre 48.47 current US$ per square kilometre 822.35 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre 927.45 current US$ per square kilometre 105.39 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 660.56 current US$ per square kilometre 778.87 current US$ per square kilometre 118.31 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Jamaica or Jordan?
Jamaica, at 395.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 391.34 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Jamaica and Jordan?
4.41 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Jamaica ranks 21st and Jordan ranks 22nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/jordan/">Jamaica vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.